Media sentiment · 媒体话语 · 2022 – 2026

How the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Xinhua frame the GSI

外交部与新华社的全球安全倡议话语

1,695 articles from China's two English-language state-media channels — the Xinhua English news wire and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs' English website (news releases and spokesperson press briefings), 2022–2026. Each sentence is tagged for the regional group or country it references and scored for sentiment, so we can see who China's GSI rhetoric targets and how the tone differs by audience.

articles mentioning GSI
sentences scored for sentiment
most negative source group
most positive source group
Country focus · 国别提及

Mentions and negativity by country各国提及次数与负面比例

The map shows either the volume of mentions (every country mentioned in the GSI corpus) or the share of sentences that are negative — restricted to countries with at least 25 mentions, where the share is stable. Share-negative is a clearer signal than the mean, which is compressed because Chinese state media is uniformly positive in tone; negativity tracks conflict and rivalry (Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Ukraine highest). Hover for both; click to open the country profile.

Colour by
Mentions: all countries. % negative: only countries with ≥25 mentions.
Time series · 时间序列

The GSI in state propaganda over time按对象的季度情感

Quarterly coverage of the GSI. The Metric toggle switches between % negative (the share of sentences that are negative — the clearest, most variable signal), mean sentiment (the raw Bing score, compressed and mostly positive), and article count. The chart opens on the actor lines; click any chip below to add a series — including coverage toward authoritarian vs democratic regimes and US allies vs non-allies (by the countries each sentence references), or the two GSI doctrine phrases (indivisible security, legitimate security concerns). Click an active chip again to remove it.

Metric
Publication
Series — click to show / hide

Share of sentences with negative sentiment (Bing score < 0). Higher = more critical coverage.

Source-group breakdown · 按对象分布

Volume and negativity by group各对象的数量与负面比例

How much each group is talked about, and the share of those sentences that are negative. Switch the breakdown between regional source groups and the regime / alliance cut (authoritarian vs democratic, US ally vs non-ally — by the countries each sentence references).

Breakdown by

Sentence volume (bars) and share of sentences that are negative (dots) per source group, by publication.

Articles · 文章检索

Search the GSI media corpus检索原始文章

Search and sort the 1,695 MFA + Xinhua articles. Sort by sentiment to see the extremes; filter by publication or by keyword.

Publication
Sort by
Build your own · 自定义图表

Build your own chart自定义视图

Pick a preset starting point or assemble your own from the quarterly-by-source series.